Generalized sampling and gradiometry: Changing the rules of the information game

2020 Honorary Lecturer
Europe

Johan Robertsson

ETH-Zürich

ADVERTISEMENT

Our advertisers help SEG provide services to our customers. Please consider unblocking ads for our site.

Summary

Recording seismic data involves moving from a continuous signal to a discretized data representation. The rules governing sampling of bandlimited signals and their reconstruction were pioneered by Swedish-born mathematician Harry Nyquist who studied transmission of telegraph signals in limited bandwidth channels in the 1920s. Together with Claude Shannon among others, both at Bell laboratories, he laid the foundations of information theory. The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem states that a bandlimited signal can be perfectly reconstructed at arbitrary points in between samples from an infinite sequence of equidistant samples provided that there were more than two samples per minimum period when the data were sampled. The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem of course applies to seismic data sampled on the Earth’s surface as such data are bandlimited constrained to a cone in the frequency-wavenumber domain bounded by the minimum velocity at the recording locations. The less well-known generalized sampling theorem by Athanasios Papoulis from 1977 teaches that if different filtered versions of the original bandlimited data (filtered before sampling/decimation), the classical Nyquist-Shannon sampling criterion can be less strict. The generalized sampling theorem has direct applications for acquisition of exploration seismic data for instance resulting in considerable efficiency gains in the acquisition of surface seismic data. In addition the topic of simultaneous source acquisition can be described in a generalized sampling theorem context.

Similar to acquisition efficiency advances offered by the generalized sampling theorem, wavefield gradiometry also benefits from different data types (combinations of spatial gradients) of the underlying wavefield that are exploited to derive information that would not be available in conventional wavefield recordings (e.g., to determine whether recordings correspond to P- or S-waves, determining slowness of arrivals, etc.). Recently, an increased interest in rotational seismology is one example of wavefield gradiometry advances.

Starting with the pioneering work by Harry Nyquist, I will discuss acquisition and processing of seismic data. I will focus on recent developments building on Papoulis’ generalized sampling theorem including examples from signal-apparition-based simultaneous source acquisition as well as seismic data acquisition on the moon and on Mars where logistics is severely limited benefitting significantly from advanced multi-measurement acquisition with foundations in wavefield gradiometry.

Robertsson_abstract

Figure: Example of gradiometry used to derive the first shallow S-wave profile of the lunar crust (Sollberger et al., 2016)

Biography

Robertsson

Johan Robertsson received an M.Sc. from Uppsala University, Sweden, in 1991 and a Ph.D. from Rice University, Houston, Texas, in 1994. He spent 1995 and 1996 as a postdoc at ETH in Zürich, Switzerland. He then joined Schlumberger in 1996, where he spent 15 years in various R&D and management positions in Cambridge (UK), London, and Oslo. In his last assignment with Schlumberger, he was the research director of geophysics and scientific advisor at Schlumberger Cambridge Research. Since 2012 he is professor at ETH where he holds the Chair of Applied Geophysics and leads the Exploration and Environmental Geophysics (EEG) group. In 2015, he received the Eni “New frontiers in hydrocarbons upstream award” together with former colleagues from Schlumberger. In 2016, he was awarded an ERC advanced grant from the European Union and also founded Seismic Apparition GmbH. In 2018, he received EAGE’s Conrad Schlumberger award. Prof. Robertsson’s research interests include seismic acquisition, simultaneous source separation, wave-equation-based processing, physics of wave propagation, and full-waveform modeling. He has held various offices with SEG, EAGE, and RAS.

Schedule

Date Location Host
9 Jan Pau, France Total
13 Jan Berlin, Germany Student Geoscientific Society Berlin & Potsdam
15 Jan Freiberg, Germany SEG Student Chapter Freiberg
17 Jan Warsaw, Poland Polish Academy of Sciences SEG Student Chapter
20 Jan Sunbury, United Kingdom BP Sunbury
21 Jan Leeds, United Kingdom University of Leeds
22 Jan Edinburgh, United Kingdom Univ of Edinburgh
23 Mar Trondheim, Norway SEG Student Chapter in NTNU, Trondheim
24 Mar Oslo, Norway Oslo Society of Exploration Geophysicists (OSEG)
26 Mar Svalbard, Norway Svalbard Geoscience Group
31 Mar Uppsala, Sweden Uppsala University SEG Student Chapter
1 Apr Hamburg, Germany Wintershall Dea GmbH
15 Apr Amsterdam, Netherlands Shell
16 Apr Delft, Netherlands Delft Organisation of Geophysics Students (DOGS)
22 Apr Paris, France Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
23 Apr Massy Cedex, France CGG
28 Apr Trieste, Italy University of Trieste, Exploration Geophysics Group
30 Apr Pisa, Italy SEG University of Pisa Geophysical Society
13 May Bucharest, Romania SEG Bucharest Student Chapter  

Please contact Host Sections for lecture locations and times.

SEG Honorary Lecturers
Supported by:

Shell

This website uses cookies. If you continue without changing your browser settings, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can disable cookies at any time. Learn more

We also use partner advertising cookies to deliver targeted, geophysics-related advertising to you; these cookies are not added without your direct consent.

 

8801 S. Yale Ave. Suite 500
Tulsa, OK 74137
Phone: 918-497-5500
Email: [email protected]

CONNECT with us

Don't miss a thing.

Visit your SEG Communications Center to update your communications preferences.

Don't have an SEG account? It's free to create one - and you don't have to be an SEG member.

Twitter facebook linkedIn instagram youtube
Featuring bonus content!