2010 Honorary LecturerSponsored by Shell

Central & South America

Efrain Mendez-Hernandez

PEMEX E&P - Poza Rica, Mexico

Quantitative seismic analysis and its role in improving reservoir description and exploration results

 
Abstract
Efrain Mendez-HernandezIn the initial stage of the petroleum value chain, seismic interpretation is often qualitative in nature as is appropriate for exploration screening. As we move ahead to development, more data are incorporated, and progressively more quantitative seismic analyses are required for predicting elastic properties and, under a proper tie-to-well data, to infer rock and fluid properties to populate models for reservoir characterization, to develop better EOR strategies, and even to rejuvenate mature fields.

Uncertainty and risk are always inherent to quantitative seismic analysis. Some major "tollgates" will help to mitigate the technical risk. If the seismic and well-log data are not of sufficient quality, the rock physics models do not support determination of reservoir properties through seismic attributes; or if the wavelet derivation does not confirm the fidelity of the seismic data, further expenditures can be avoided. Even then, if these issues have been overcome, a certain level of uncertainty remains due to the nature of the inverse problem, and the way a seismic model is restricted by the real subsurface conditions. These produce, on the whole, nonuniqueness of the final predictions which have to be understood, and constrained. In this stage, a degree of freedom has to be granted to include some valuable qualitative information provided by the experience of the geoscientist, reinforced with reality checks.

In practice, a variety of leading-edge technologies are routinely applied to extract seismic attributes, and, under the proper rock physics framework, to recognize patterns and make quantitative predictions for prospective intervals, and for reservoir characterization and monitoring. As the reservoir heterogeneity becomes more complex, the geologic-economic risk in predicting properties from seismic data also increases. Less deterministic and more multidisciplinary approaches are then demanded for data integration from key disciplines, risk assessment, and quantification of uncertainty. In this nonlinear world, applications to seismically estimate quantitative distribution of physical properties, analyze fizz-water zones, and estimate fracture/density orientation are integrated through probabilistic approaches and soft computing tools including Bayesian formalisms, neural networks, and fuzzy reasoning schemes.

It is well understood that risk and uncertainty are inherent parts of the oil and gas business; however, as the decline of the reservoirs increases and the easy petroleum has gone, more investment capital will be riding on the ability of the geoscientist to objectively quantify physical properties from seismic data based on true multidisciplinary solutions.